• HOME
  • Community
  • Businesses
  • eEdition
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Buy Photos
  • Contact Us
  • Park likely to euthanize bear that attacked
    3 months ago | 2154 views | 51 51 comments | 1 1 recommendations | email to a friend | print
    National park wildlife official Rick Varner tranquilizes a bear cub believed to have bitten a visitor on the foot. The park will euthanize the bear once it confirms it was the same one that bit the park visitor. (Photo courtesy Mark Shelton)
    National park wildlife official Rick Varner tranquilizes a bear cub believed to have bitten a visitor on the foot. The park will euthanize the bear once it confirms it was the same one that bit the park visitor. (Photo courtesy Mark Shelton)
    slideshow
    By DEREK HODGES

    Staff Writer

    NATIONAL PARK — It looks likely the bear that attacked a hiker on the Laurel Falls trail last week will be euthanized soon, with Smokies officials bound by National Park Service bear management policies. Anger toward the man involved in the incident may be somewhat misplaced, officials say.

    Park spokeswoman Nancy Gray explained Monday that Smokies biologists have no choice but to put down the bear, with worries similar to those that have led to laws requiring dogs that attack humans to be neutralized. The whole situation is a sad reminder of the adage among park staffers that, “A fed bear is a dead bear.”

    “It leaves no option for us when a bear has injured an individual,” Gray said. “In our bear management program there are methods established for how we deal with bears in different situations and circumstances. In a situation where a bear has threatened or harmed an individual, we don’t have any choice. There is a risk in allowing the bear to remain in the wild because we don’t know if it’s going to attack someone again if it is moved to another part of the park.”

    Park workers have captured the animal they believe is responsible for the attack and are working to confirm the identity.

    Options are also limited; there aren’t many places that take wild bears that cannot be left free. Most bear rescue operations are only looking for non-aggressive bears that can be rehabilitated and returned to the wild. Many zoos won’t take wild bears, and there is already a surplus of captive-bred animals.

    The fact that the animal is likely to be put to death has caused an uproar, with angry comments on The Mountain Press’ Web site.

    A Facebook group has also been created titled “Save the black bear in the Smokies from dumb tourists.” That page had drawn nearly 1,300 fans determined to fight for the life of the 60-pound, 2-year-old female bear they have named “Laurel.” The group calls on its members to “wear out (the) answering machine” of park officials.

    Gray said there is misunderstanding as to what the person did before the attack and pointed out every other person who has encountered the bear on the Laurel Falls Trail shares blame for what has happened.

    “We had reports from two weeks ago or more of people who had been on the trail and saw people feeding this bear,” Gray said. “This bear was obviously a food-conditioned bear. She was used to being around people and there were witnesses out there the day of the incident who reported individuals feeding the bear and getting close to it.”

    While the victim of the attack — who sustained only minor injuries — has been portrayed as an overly-aggressive tourist who got too close to take pictures, witness reports indicate that’s not the case.

    “He had actually stepped off the trail and stepped back on when he noticed there was a bear on the trail,” Gray said. “He was not approaching the bear, but the bear actually approached him ,apparently expecting him to feed it like other people had done.”

    When the man offered no food, the bear apparently snapped at his foot.

    Many have called for charges to be filed against the man, citing laws that restrict folks from approaching wildlife in the park. However, Gray said there will likely not be charges because the man was not disturbing the animal.

    “The law says you have to willfully and intentionally approach within 50 yards of a bear or an elk,” Gray said. “This man did not willfully or intentionally approach this bear.”

    It certainly seems true, as the Facebook writer opined, that the victim was the only one who reported having been attacked by the bear.

    “How do we cite this individual when we know there were a lot of people on that trail even that day who also approached the bear?” Gray asked rhetorically. “This was a situation that took a long time to develop. I think this person has learned the lesson just from the results of his actions.”

    As for those who want to save the animal’s life, Gray thinks it’s likely too late. However, concerned citizens can have an active role in protecting other animals in the park by taking care not to create situations where bears lose their natural fear of humans and by teaching others to do the same.

    dhodges@themountainpress.com
    comments (51)
    « nancy in MN wrote on Wednesday, May 19 at 02:51 PM »
    What's wrong with this picture. Location: Laurel Falls, Tennesse, a national park. In this park resides black bears. Signs are posted all over the place telling tourists that it is illegal to feed the bears and there is a fine for doing so. A cub, probably recently ousted by its mother (which is natural for bear culture when they are yearlings and mating season occurs in May and June) which park officials should know has been fed by tourist for at least two as has been reported to the park officials. Park officials make no attempt to fine individuals or even stop them from feeding bears. The cub is becoming accustomed to humans feeding it and does not need to forage for her food. This bear is drawing tourists which are now filling the state coffers. Suddenly the bear nips a tourist on the toe. (Provocation on part of the tourist is in dispute based on first report and then adjusted reports as time went on.) An injury that did not need medical attention. Now the bear has been caught. Probably lured by food and handcuffing the bear was no problem. Okay so it was tranquilized. The bear will be killed by the park officials because it is now may pose a danger to humans. Park officials are not even positive that they have the offending bear.

    Who is in more danger? humans? the bear?

    Who is more intelligent? humans? the bear?

    Who deserves to be punished? humans? the bear?

    The bears looses its life and the humans blatantly breaking the law are ignored by the very people charged with enforcing the law.
    « Broken.. wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 09:36 PM »
    So reports for two weeks of people feeding the bear in this area were not investigated? How simple would that have been to be preventative and stop this before it got out of hand? I don't understand how people think they have a right to kill a wild animal for human error. If you can't follow the rules set forth, keep yourself out of the parks!!
    « Samantha B. wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 08:49 PM »
    My family has sent our E-mails and letters to save Laurel. Please people, don't stop those contacts with the appropriate offices. As far as we know, she is still alive and we need to push for the right thing to happen here. Don't give up!
    « nikkijen wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 08:12 PM »
    so let me get this straight, the park knew about the bears being fed for 2 weeks and didn't do anything, and then when the bear finally did what a bear does--poof let's kill her. almost seems like they want to thin the population out some. this is their job to protect the park. please explain to me why deteriorate tactics were not used to have the bear leave the area (paint balls, air guns, warning shots etc). Oh wait, let me guess, the park membership dropped by almost half last year and what is one of the biggest tourist draws, our bears, so, let's weigh the risks and have the bears there so the tourists can see and everyone just turn a head like you don't see and we will just hope for the best in the meantime. So, which is it, they need to thin the population or all for a dollar?
    « monica morrison wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 08:08 PM »
    Wow! Kill the bear, because people have no freakin common sense! C'mon....
    « EXREALESTATEAGENT wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 07:45 PM »
    There is a cabin company that tells these tourons how to leave food out to attract the bears to the cabins.
    « PEOPLEHATER wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 07:43 PM »
    Lets put people down who trespass in the animals homes. Come on!!!! REALLY!! we dont even kill violents criminals who attack people unprovoked. And people are suppose to be smarter then animals. We get to pay for murderers to continue their pathetic useless lives.
    « Susan S wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 07:38 PM »
    It's obvious that the park was negligent in protecting tourists from this situation. They knew for 2 weeks that people were feeding the bears and let the situation escalate. Why didn't they close the main trailhead and put up the bear warning signs as is usual procedure for the park? They put the public in danger by ignoring this protocol. Now they want to put the bear down because of their neglect. This is not acceptable. That trail should've been closed if they knew there was heightened bear activity and that people were enticing the bears with food.

    The park is at fault for not doing what it needed to do.
    « sammyjoe wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 07:21 PM »
    This is bull!!! Humans invade the bears territory and the bear has to die. The bear has to die for living in its own home God created for it. The National Oark Services need to change their stupid policies.
    « Mike Bowen wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 07:00 PM »
    Park officals SHOULD NOT put the bear down because of human error. It's plain down right wrong.
    « GUESS WHAT wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 06:27 PM »
    BEARS ARE WILD CREATURES. THEY BITE PEOPLE. they have the right to bite people because they are protecting their home. People have comfy homes to go to after they have caused a bear to die because they wanted to get close to it. People develope a "group mentality" when in situations like that. Soloman Asch did a study on social conformity, and it proves that a group will act as an individual. If all those people fed the bear, or coaxed it or did not try to get away from it, they are guilty. If you want to see bears in safety without worry of getting bitten, or causing it to lose it's life over your stupidity, then GO TO THE ZOO!
    « kimby wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 05:39 PM »
    Laurel should not be killed for humans' mistakes. This trend needs to stop. We're invading their land, not the other way around.



    To answer a question someone had about why a bear can be killed in one state and not another...it depends on the population. Aside from certain animals being on a national endangered species list, states also have their own. Black bears are plentiful in some areas, and not protected or endangered. Other states have fewer than a few dozen black bears, so in those states, they are endangered. Even in protected status, if a bear attacks a person, they can still be euthanized.
    « Laurel Friend wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 05:14 PM »
    So I get stung by a bee and I am allergic I do expect all of the bee'd in the area be killed..
    « ChickInAVL wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 05:00 PM »
    As a neighbor of the Great Smokies National Park, I am appalled that the park service plans to kill the 60 lb black bear cub who bit a tourist. I implore the park service to NOT carry through with this. The article even says that they are not SURE that the bear they have tranquilized and catpured is the bear that bit the tourist!!

    Also, the park service needs to take the responsibility for this human - bear run in, as they did NOTHING to correct the ongoing problem on this trail. TWO WEEKS!! No increase in park rangers to write citations for those feeding or harassing the bears. No shutting down of the trail to encourage the bears people had been feeding to move on. NOT A D*$# thing!! Whoever is in charge of the Park Service needs to step up, man up, and take responsibility!!

    I am livid that a bear who is doing what bears do is being given a death sentence, while the park service blames the bear. Somthing is wrong with this picture.

    SAVE LAUREL!!!!!
    « Save The Bears wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 04:36 PM »
    How can the black bear be an endangered animal in one state but voluntarily killed by state authorities in another?

    Associated Press - April 16, 2010 5:14 AM ET

    EPPS, La. (AP) - Wildlife agents say a Louisiana black bear was shot and killed near Epps, in West Carroll Parish.

    The bears are on the endangered species list and it is against the law to kill them.

    The dead black bear was found by a farmer and reported to the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries on April 8. Sgt. Scott Matthews says the bear was shot with a rifle.

    Officials are looking for the shooter.

    Killing a bear is a violation of state law and the federal Endangered Species Act. Violators face fines and jail time.

    « John D. Jeffries wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 03:59 PM »
    I believe that if I had a 60 lb. Bear coming towards me I would be yelling "Get Bear!!!" and start backing up not holding my ground and taking its picture.

    It sounds like the NPS is lax by knowing for two weeks that there were problems on that trail.

    I've always had high regard for our Rangers but I'm skeptical that this person is not being cited along with others who are disregarding the law.

    The meanest animal in the park drive cars and disregard what God has given us. I hope Laurel escapes!!!
    « pamhiker2 wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 03:57 PM »
    Seems funny to me that the reort here is different than the original report....HMMMM..coverup maybe.. oh, Let's not challenge the NPS... why not? this is America..I can picture exactly what happened and I believe the original report... The incident is over, Let's report what's going on and with truthful quotes....there is no vigil anti group here, no one is out to get anybody, just want justice and truth which is not a money making entity....We all know the news media in the USA reports what will help them out only, and making the NPS mad will not bring in advertisers ,subscribers or notoriety.. but what is wrong is wrong... we are looking for education and accountability..and life for a young bear who was placed in this situation.. people are not without error here.... thank you
    « Save Laurel Please wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 03:43 PM »
    If this person has truly learned a lesson from this experience, I hope he is now part of the effort to save this baby bear. As for all the humans that do not read signs I hope you are reading now before another poor bear has to pay the price for your stupidity
    « L. McCarter wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 03:39 PM »
    I really get tired of The Mountain Press not covering both sides. You never hear about the stabbings in Gatlinburg, etc...it may "hurt" the tourism. What about the quality of life here for the locals? Which includes the wildlife that we are suppose to be protecting? This place we live in is a blessing. But most business minded people "care" more about tourism than quality of life. It will catch up and this little yearling is just the start. If this is not stopped what's next? The park official's statement are cold and hard. Not ONCE was there a heartfelt comment towards "laurel" this is her job!Where is her heart? Looks like its grown cold for a job that must be done by someone who loves what they do. This is their sanctuary... that is what the page for the National Park states. So why are they allowing people to feed bears for two weeks w/o stopping this? Sounds like some people employed at the park are on burn out! Please Mt. Press take a stand and do what is moral and right. This is a 60 pound bear. Attack? I think not! My dog is bigger than this cub. Shame on everyone who turns their cheek. If people dont start standing up for what is right then you really need to think about where this planet will be without us to protect it! Please help save Laurel!! That is all this is about help save this cub!
    « tigerlilydirk wrote on Tuesday, May 18 at 03:35 PM »
    This man walks in this bears territory, disturbing wildlife in a state park and expects to walk away.

    In my opinion he is lucky the bear did not kill him for being such an idiot!! Someone didn't listen in boys scouts " Leave no trace " We are nothing but hypocrites and monsters if we were to euthanize this animal which was only defending it's home from the biggest predator alive!!